Last Updated on June 12, 2025 by Giorgia Guazzarotti
After reading one too many misleading skincare claims, I have to ask: do you ever wonder if anything that comes out of a brand’s mouth is true? You know they lie to you ALL the time to sell you crap you don’t need and, often, doesn’t even work. And you’ve learnt to smell the BS a mile away.
You’re getting smarter. But so are they. Some of the stuff they say seems so logical and realistic, but when you dig deeper, they’re just subtle and cunning lies that bend and twist the truth just enough to pique your curiosity and part you with your money.
Those are harder to spot even for the savviest of consumers. Like the kind of claim that makes you think, “Well, maybe it technically doesn’t say it’ll fix my skin overnight… but it kind of does?” Sneaky. So, how can you protect yourself and your wallet? Here are the most misleading skincare claims you need to look out for:
- 1. Chemical-Free
- 2. Reduces The Appearance Of Wrinkles
- 3. Helps Reduce Wrinkles/Make Hair Stronger/Boost Collagen Production, Etc
- 4. Natural
- 5. Hypoallergenic
- 6. pH Balanced
- 7. Dermatologist-Tested” Or “Dermatologist-Recommended”
- BONUS: Other Sneaky Claims That Didn’t Make the Top 7-But Still Deserve a Side Eye
- The Bottom Line
1. Chemical-Free
WHAT IT IMPLIES
Chemicals are all toxic and poisonous and if you put them on your skin, they’ll give you cancer or another horrible deadly disease. Brands that use them know this and they don’t care. They’re willing to kill you to get your money. Unlike those natural and organic brands that charge you a premium for “safer” products. Those “really care”.
THE TRUTH
This is one of the most misleading skincare claims of all times. Why? Chemical-free cosmetics DON’T exist! Everything made of matter is a chemical or a mixture of chemicals. Yep, water is a chemical. Aloe vera is a chemical. All those other natural extracts in your lotions and potions, they’re all chemicals. Heck, even your body is made up of lots of different chemicals. It doesn’t matter if an ingredient is derived from nature or made in a lab, it’s a chemical. You want a real chemical-free moisturizer? Get an empty jar and write the word moisturizer on it. Oh wait, even the jar is made of chemicals. Hard luck, sorry!
Related: Why Chemical-Free Skincare Is A Lie
Need help creating an anti-aging routine that really works? Sign up to the newsletter below to receive the “Anti-Aging Skincare Routine Cheatsheet” (it includes product recommendations, too!)
2. Reduces The Appearance Of Wrinkles
WHAT IT IMPLIES
You know those wrinkles on your face? They’re gonna look smaller.
THE TRUTH
This is sort of true. Most creams contain either silicones to fill in wrinkles, hyaluronic acid to plump up the skin, or brightening pigments that allow your skin to better reflect the light. Those are all things that are gonna reduce the appearance of wrinkles.
Appearance is the key word here. These products can’t make wrinkles smaller. They can just make them look less obvious. For a little while. Once the effects of the cream rub off, your wrinkles will be there, as deep as before.
Related: How Antiaging Creams REALLY Work
3. Helps Reduce Wrinkles/Make Hair Stronger/Boost Collagen Production, Etc
WHAT IT IMPLIES
This product or natural extract (it’s almost always a natural extract, isn’t it?) is gonna solve all your skin and hair problems.
THE TRUTH
You know that little word, helps? That’s what brands use when they want to make you believe that a product or extract does more than it actually does. It’s like, you know when you’re trying to lose weight and they tell you this type of tea or whatever will help you? Well, that may or may not be true, but if you’re a couch potato who dines on junk food every night, the tea alone surely won’t work.
It’s the same for cosmetics. Most moisturizers can’t reduce wrinkles, for example. But they could help if you lead a healthy lifestyle. Or, take natural extracts. Let’s say apple. That’s full of antioxidants, so it can fight wrinkles, right? Only if they put enough apple in the cream. Too often they don’t. But it doesn’t matter. They didn’t say that apple would fight wrinkles, only that it would help [the formula? your healthy diet?] fight wrinkles.
Basically, proving that a product can help do something is easier than proving it actually does that something. A brand just has to add the word “help” in its marketing copy and it can literally get away with making any claim it wants.
Related: 8 Science-Backed Ways To Boost Collagen
4. Natural
WHAT IT IMPLIES
If it’s natural, it’s safer. You can buy from us, we won’t kill you or your children.
THE TRUTH
Natural means nothing. The term isn’t regulated in any way. That’s why a lot of synthetic stuff almost always finds its way inside natural products. By the way, what does natural mean anyway? Some natural ingredients have to undergo chemical processes to remove allergens or to extract a certain oil or whatever from them. Are those still natural for you?
Related: How To Spot Greenwashing In Skincare
5. Hypoallergenic
WHAT IT IMPLIES
These products are gentler and will never cause an irritation to anyone. Not even to super sensitive skin.
THE TRUTH
BS. Hypoallergenic doesn’t mean anything. The term is not regulated in any way. Brands can stuff these products with allergens and still claim they’re hypoallergenic. What a joke!
Related: Are Hypoallergenic Products Really Safer?
6. pH Balanced
WHAT IT IMPLIES
These products are formulated at the right pH for your skin, so they work better and are gentler to boot.
THE TRUTH
All products are made in a range that is compatible with the neutral pH of the skin. And why would it not be so? Get the pH wrong and you’ll give someone an irritation. Or dry out their skin. That’s hardly good publicity for your product, is it?
Related: What Are The Best Low pH Foaming Cleansers?
7. Dermatologist-Tested” Or “Dermatologist-Recommended”
WHAT IT IMPLIES
A trustworthy doctor with perfect skin in a white coat personally tested this product, loved it, and told all her clients to use it.
THE TRUTH
Yeah… not really. “Dermatologist-tested” just means a dermatologist (literally just one, in some cases) was involved at some point. Maybe they glanced at the formula, maybe they signed off on it, maybe they ran one tiny test in a lab with 12 participants. It doesn’t mean the product passed any strict safety standards or that it’s good for your skin. And “dermatologist-recommended”? Even looser. That could just mean a derm somewhere once mentioned it. There’s zero regulation around it. It’s basically the skincare version of “my friend said it was fine.”
BONUS: Other Sneaky Claims That Didn’t Make the Top 7-But Still Deserve a Side Eye
Since originally writing this article, I came across quite a few other misleading skincare claims that need debunking ASAP, so I’ve added them in this bonus section. Here we go:
“Clinically Proven”
If you think this means the product went through rigorous, peer-reviewed trials-think again. Sometimes, it’s just a tiny brand-funded test on a handful of people with vague results like “skin felt smoother.” Technically, that counts as proof. Wild, right?
“Instant Results”
Usually means you’ll feel something, not see something. Like, your skin might feel smoother because of silicones or look glowier from mica – aka makeup ingredients disguised as skincare. But if you’re expecting actual improvement? That takes weeks.
“Fragrance-Free”
You’d think it means no scent. But brands often sneak in fragrant plant extracts or “masking agents” that don’t count as added fragrance… legally. Lavender oil? Citrus peel? Rosewater? All naturally fragrant and all fair game under “fragrance-free.”
Related: Is Fragrance In Skincare Products As Bad As Paula Begoun Says?
“Non-Comedogenic”
Supposedly means it won’t clog pores. But there’s no standard definition. The tests that created this label were done on rabbit ears in the ’70s. Yeah, really. What clogs your pores might not clog someone else’s. Best to learn your own triggers.
“Anti-Pollution Skincare”
It’s mostly just moisturizers with antioxidants rebranded to sound high-tech. Pollution does hurt your skin, but if you’re using vitamin C or green tea, you’re already covered. No need to buy a whole new cream that says “urban defense” or whatever.
“Safe For Sensitive Skin”
Another label that means nothing. There’s no regulation, and it doesn’t stop brands from adding fragrance, alcohol, or essential oils. If you’ve got sensitive skin, ignore the promises and read the actual ingredient list.
The Bottom Line
Skincare marketing is a minefield – and brands are counting on you to read the label, assume the best, and never ask questions. But now you know better. Now you know the most misleading skincare claims they’re spreading. Just because something sounds scientific, gentle, or effective doesn’t mean it actually is. Check the ingredients, question the claims, and don’t fall for the fluff. Your skin (and your bank account) will thank you.
Stop wasting your time and money on stuff that doesn’t work. Click on the image below to download “Skincare That Works” and finally get your best skin day – every day.
Yeah, language can make all kind of meaningless things sound meaningful. And cosmetic companies know how to use it 😉 I’m most vigilant with products with bio/eco labels, as well as with products with “miraculous” claims, as most often they are based on silicones – and I don’t get along very well with them…
Eli, that it’s so true. It’s incredible how they can imply a product can do something without saying it outright, thus avoiding breaking the law. We consumers must be very vigilant indeed. Well done for not falling for the hype. 🙂
That’s a very well-written and true blog post, Gio. Kudos to you that you’ve summed up the most ridiculous but alluring claims. I always have to laugh about the anti-wrinkle creams. My granny and mom have always used baby cream or Nivea cream to keep a tight and freshly-looking skin. I also know some older ladies who only use olive oil to nourish their aging skin and who look absolutely stunning for their age. Well, they also live healthy considering their lifestyle. That might be the main reason for their younger looks. In addition, I turn a blind eye to the wrong claims on mascara. Mega volume, super curl, perfect separation and yadi yadi yada… I still wait for a mascara that says “suitable for short and fine lashes” or “suitable for every lash type”. How cool would that be? But oh well, it doesn’t sound as spectacular as mega volume or va-va-voom lashes… *sigh*
Mylanqolia, mascara claims are so ridiculous, aren’t they? They always claim to make lashes 10x bigger or something, and never deliver. And thank goodness for that, cos would want lashes that big and long?! And I fear that “suitable for every lash type” is something we may see sooner rather than later too. *sighs*
you got it!
Allison, 😉
didn’t know a lot of these things! Informative post
Smashinbeauty, glad you found it helpful 🙂
The chemical one always bothers me because it suggests that synthetic chemicals are the devils spawn whereas natural things are beautiful and lovely (I can forgive non-scientists for only associating chemical with the synthetic variety). It’s the same kind of thing that suggests that synthetic variants of chemicals aren’t as good or are more dangerous than naturally extracted counterparts, which is by and large utter rubbish and often the opposite is true. Admittedly as a chemist I do get a bit personal about it.
Long tangent aside, this is a brilliant blog post. I do really love how you dispel myths and claims 🙂
Katie, that really annoys me too, and I’m not a chemist. I can imagine how much it annoys you. I completely agree with everything you said. Natural isn’t better than synthetic or vice versa, it just depends on the ingredients. Some are good, some are bad, regardless of their origin. It’s a shame the word chemical has acquired such a bad reputation, as a lot of chemicals are very good for us.
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed the post. 🙂