What Does In-Vitro Mean?

by Gio

in vitro meaning

You know me. I’m a sceptic.

If you want me to believe the extract from that rare blue flower that blooms only at midnight in the highland rainforest of some remote island will erase my wrinkles and make me look 10 years younger, you’d better have some scientific studies to back that up.

Serious scientific studies, I mean.

The kind done on real people. Lots of them.

Not the kind done in a petri dish. Those aren’t worth much. Here’s why:

In-vitro vs in-vivo

You can do scientific studies either in-vitro or in-vivo.

Vitro comes from Latin and its means “glass”. These studies are done on skin cells in a petri dish.

You can see the limitations, right? These studies can tell us how a substance works on isolated skin cells. But on your body, skin cells aren’t isolated.

So, just because in-vitro research says something is awesome, it doesn’t mean it is. Something that works well in-vitro may not work at all or even be harmful in-vivo.

In-vivo is on a real person. And studies done on real people often refute the findings of those done in a petri dish.

In-vitro tests are done on skin cells in a petri dish, not on real people. Don't trust them!Click to Tweet

What Are The Limitations of in-vitro tests?

Skin cells on a petri dish aren’t attached to the rest of the body, obviously. So, when a study is done in-vitro, we have no way of knowing how deep an ingredient can penetrate the skin.

This is important for two reasons:

  1. The best skincare ingredients, such as retinol and vitamin C, have to penetrate the skin and reach the cells under the upper stratum corneum to work their magic. If they stayed on the surface, they wouldn’t do much.
  2. If something can penetrate the body, it could potentially be harmful to our health. Before we put something on our skin, we need to make sure that what gets in is safe and won’t cause problems.

In-vitro results don’t automatically translate in-vivo. That doesn’t make these tests useless. Some ingredients that showed promise in-vitro have turned out to work really well in-vivo too. But in-vitro results should ALWAYS be verified by in-vivo testing.

An example? Peptides.

Peptides are really hot right now. Brands are putting them everywhere, shouting from the rooftops how amazingly well they fight wrinkles.

What they don’t tell you?

These studies have been done almost always in-vitro. Does that mean they don’t work? Nope. They may work well indeed, but until I see these claims confirmed by in-vivo testing, you won’t find me splurging on a cream just because it has peptides.

Related: Do Peptides Really Work?: Here’s What The Science Says

The Bottom Line

Next time a cosmetic company trumpets a study to promote its products, look at the fine print. Was the study done in-vitro? If so, don’t buy the hype just yet. Wait till in-vivo research confirms (or refutes) those results. That’s when you know if something really works (or not).

Do you rely on scientific studies to tell you if a skincare products works or not? If so, how well do you trust in-vitro testing?

Take The Guesswork Out Of Skincare Shopping

Screenshot from 2017 04 30 11 51 35

Get access to the “Pro Skincare Library” for exclusive skincare routine “cheat sheets” and tricks to help you navigate the beauty aisles jungle like a pro and immediately know what to pick off the shelves to achieve the gorgeous skin of your dreams - even when you’re drowning in an endless sea of skincare products.


Powered by ConvertKit

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

4 comments

Ana July 12, 2013 - 10:43 pm

I’m a bit tired of the ‘scientific results’.
Tested on 12 whole women for an entire week? 1200% increase in volume in lab tests?

Come on.

Reply
beautifulwithbrains July 13, 2013 - 2:35 pm

Ana, I agree. There are some scientific studies that are valid and serious, but somehow these never get used by companies to promote their products. They prefer us to give us those unrealistic statistic and results that don’t really mean anything.

Reply
eight July 13, 2013 - 1:27 am

I don’t usually trust “scientific results” either. I’d rather do my own research on ingredients rather than splurge on something just because it has the latest “miracle ingredient.”

Reply
beautifulwithbrains July 13, 2013 - 2:42 pm

Eight, I agree. We should look at solid scientific studies that can confirm the efficacy of ingredients, not just rely on those that companies show us.

Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.